SC modifies 3-year rule for judicial entrance: What does it say on who makes a good district judge

What makes a good judge - years of courtroom experience, or rigorous training before taking the Bench? The Supreme Court has significantly changed the rules for entry-level judicial recruitment. After mandating three years of practice at the Bar in 2025, the Court has now moved to a new model combining one year of practice, one year of Judicial Academy training, and one year of supervised Law Clerkship. The majority says three years at the Bar does not necessarily translate into meaningful courtroom experience. Justice K. Vinod Chandran, in dissent, warned against creating a “cadre of careerists rather than jurists”. Ruchi Bhattar discusses the Supreme Court's new judicial recruitment framework with Pinky Anand, senior advocate and former Additional Solicitor General; Bharat Chugh, advocate and former Civil Judge and Siddharth Raman, Co-founder, TheProfesseer. Watch the full discussion and tell us what you think: Is three years at the Bar really necessary to become a good judge? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Exclusive content, special privileges & more – Subscribe to ThePrint for Special benefits: https://tinyurl.com/4ymm9wh5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Connect with ThePrint » Subscribe to ThePrint: https://tinyurl.com/4ymm9wh5 » Subscribe to our YouTube Channel: https://bit.ly/3nCMpht » Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theprintindia » Tweet us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/theprintindia » Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theprintindia » Find us on LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/company/theprint » Subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram: https://t.me/ThePrintIndia » Find us on Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2NMVlnB » Find us on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/3pEOta8